Clarifying user request
I’m thinking about how the CLI might have default approvals for failures, but I’m not certain. It’s better to ask the user exactly what they want. Should I provide match details, statistics, causes, tactical analysis, or maybe compile media reactions? I'm considering the biggest defeats for the China Women’s National Team, recalling scores like 0-8 against Germany. It’s safer to avoid making assertions without clearer details. I’ll ask for preferences and the match date.Analyzing heavy losses
I want to analyze the factors behind such a heavy loss, focusing on aspects like pressing, transition defense, midfield collapse, individual errors, and set pieces. It might be a good idea to highlight any bright spots, although I’m not sure if there are any. I’ll keep it general and finalize a response in Chinese with concise bullet points. I’ll also check if the user wants me to pull authoritative sources and offer options at the end for further information!
确实是个沉重的比分。要不要我帮你核实比赛信息（时间、赛地、阵容、技术统计）并给出权威来源？如果不查网，我也可以先做框架性的复盘与对比。
可选方向：
- 赛况与关键数据：控球、射门、xG、失误分布、定位球丢分情况
- 技战术复盘：英格兰的高压与边路强攻、中国女足的出球与中场保护问题、转换防守速度
- 历史对比：历次大比分失利与“最大比分输球”纪录背景
- 影响评估：排名与赛事前景、球队信心、教练与阵容调整方向
- 建议清单：后腰屏障与二次落点、边后卫站位与协防、门将与中卫出球套路、体能与对抗、青训与留洋路径 
告诉我你想要哪一项，或发我比赛链接；若需要我在线检索并核实来源，我可以去查。